Vitamin D receptor-binding site variants affect prostate cancer progression
Oncotarget doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18271
- Cancer - Prostate category listing has
103 items along with related searches - Overview Prostate Cancer and Vitamin D
Pages in both Prostate Cancer and Vitamin D Receptor categories
- Book: Sunlight, UV, Vitamin D and Receptor, Skin and other Cancers - Dec 2020
- Prostate Cancer associated with various genes, including Vitamin D Receptor and CYP24A1 – Nov 2019
- Prostate surgery outcomes vary with Vitamin D Receptors– May 2017
- Prostate cancer in black men is 1.6 times more likely if a poor Vitamin D Receptor – Feb 2017
- Aggressive Prostate Cancer in blacks with low vitamin D – 7X more likely if added Calcium – Jan 2017
- High PSA readings with Prostate Cancer 4 times more likely if poor Vitamin D receptor – March 2016
- 2X less prostate cancer in A-A with low Calcium is due vitamin D receptor gene – July 2013
Vitamin D Receptor category has the following
530 studies in Vitamin D Receptor category Vitamin D tests cannot detect Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) problems
See also:
A poor VDR restricts Vitamin D from getting in the cells48 studies in the Resveratrol category It appears that 30% of the population have a poor VDR (40% of the Obese )
Health problems include: Autoimmune (
Several diseases protect themselves by deactivating the Vitamin D receptor. Example: Breast Cancer
- - - - - - - -
The Vitamin D Receptor is associated with many health problems19 studies), Breast Cancer ( 24 studies), Colon Cancer ( 13 studies), Cardiovascular ( 23 studies), Cognition ( 16 studies), Diabetes ( 24 studies), Hypertension ( 9 studies), Infant ( 22 studies), Lupus ( 6 studies), Metabolic Syndrome ( 4 studies), Mortality ( 4 studies), Multiple Sclerosis ( 14 studies), Obesity ( 17 studies), Pregnancy ( 24 studies), Rheumatoid Arthritis ( 10 studies), TB ( 8 studies), VIRUS ( 37 studies), Click here for details
Some health problems, such as Breast Cancer, Diabetes, and COVID protect themselves by reducing VDR activation
55 health problems associated with poor VDR
A poor VDR is associated with the risk of 55 health problems click here for details
The risk of 48 diseases at least double with poor VDR as of Jan 2023 click here for details
Some health problem, such as Breast Cancer reduce the VDRVDR at-home test $29 - results not easily understood in 2016
There are hints that you may have inherited a poor VDR
How to increase VDR activation
Compensate for poor VDR by increasing one or more:Increasing Increases 1) Vitamin D supplement Sun
Ultraviolet -BVitamin D in the blood
and thus in the cells2) Magnesium Vitamin D in the blood
AND in the cells3) Omega-3 Vitamin D in the cells 4) Resveratrol Vitamin D Receptor 5) Intense exercise Vitamin D Receptor 6) Get prescription for VDR activator
paricalcitol, maxacalcitol?Vitamin D Receptor 7) Quercetin (flavonoid) Vitamin D Receptor 8) Zinc is in the VDR Vitamin D Receptor 9) Boron Vitamin D Receptor ?,
etc10) Essential oils e.g. ginger, curcumin Vitamin D Receptor 11) Progesterone Vitamin D Receptor 12) Infrequent high concentration Vitamin D
Increases the concentration gradientVitamin D Receptor 13) Sulfroaphane and perhaps sulfur Vitamin D Receptor 14) Butyrate especially gut Vitamin D Receptor 15) Berberine Vitamin D Receptor Note: If you are not feeling enough benefit from Vitamin D, you might try increasing VDR activation. You might feel the benefit within days of adding one or more of the above
Far healthier and stronger at age 72 due to supplements Includes 6 supplements that help the VDR
chance of surviving surgeryOne of many graphs in the PDF
50% chance of no follow-on Prostate Cancer
CC = 22 months TT = 100 months Download the PDF from VitaminDWiki
Victor C. Lin1,2, Shu-Pin Huang3,4,5, Huei-Ju Ting6, Wen-Lung Ma7,8, Chia-Cheng Yu9,10,11, Chao-Yuan Huang12,13, Hsin-Ling Yin14,15, Tsung-Yi Huang3, Cheng-Hsueh Lee3,5, Ta-Yuan Chang16, Te-Ling Lu17 and Bo-Ying Bao8,17,18
Vitamin D is an important modulator of cellular proliferation through the vitamin D receptor (VDR) that binds to DNA in the regulatory sequences of target genes. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VDR-binding sites might affect target gene expression and influence the progression of prostate cancer. Using a genome-wide prediction database, 62 SNPs in VDR-binding sites were selected for genotyping in 515 prostate cancer patients and the findings were replicated in an independent cohort of 411 patients. Prognostic significance on prostate cancer progression was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox regression model. According to multivariate analyses adjusted for known predictors, HFE rs9393682 was found to be associated with disease progression for localized prostate cancer, and TUSC3 rs1378033 was associated with progression for advanced prostate cancer in both cohorts. Vitamin D treatment inhibited HFE mRNA expression, and down-regulation of HFE by transfecting small interfering RNA suppressed PC-3 human prostate cancer cell proliferation and wound healing ability. In contrast, vitamin D treatment induced TUSC3 expression, and silencing TUSC3 promoted prostate cancer cell growth and migration. Further analysis of an independent microarray dataset confirmed that low TUSC3 expression correlated with poor patient prognosis. Our results warrant further studies using larger cohorts. This study identifies common variants in VDR-binding sites as prognostic markers of prostate cancer progression and HFE and TUSC3 as plausible susceptibility genes.
INTRODUCTION
Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that low sunlight exposure and poor vitamin D status at higher latitudes account for an elevated risk of a number of cancers, including prostate cancer [1, 2]. Vitamin D can be obtained from the diet; however, it is majorly synthesized in the skin using solar irradiation. The biologically active form of vitamin D3, 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-VD), is produced by 25-hydroxylase in the liver, followed by 1α-hydroxylase in the kidney. The actions of 1,25-VD are mediated by the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a ligand-activated transcription factor. Upon activation by 1,25-VD, VDR forms a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor, and binds to vitamin D response elements (VDREs) in the promoters of vitamin D-responsive genes [3]. Prostate cells express VDR and vitamin D metabolizing enzymes, and can respond to 1,25-VD. A volume of data supports multipronged effects of 1,25-VD in the prevention of prostate cancer progression by induction of detoxifying enzymes [4], cell cycle arrest [5], and apoptosis [6], as well as inhibition of prostate cancer cell invasion [7] and angiogenesis [8].
Genetic variants in VDREs may affect VDR-VDRE interactions, thereby resulting in altered expression of target genes and consequent cancer progression. However, no study to date has investigated the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VDR binding sites and their relationship to the clinical outcomes of prostate cancer. Accordingly, we conducted a two-stage study to evaluate the associations of VDRE SNPs with prostate cancer progression, and further assessed the functional relevance of candidate genes of interest, as illustrated in Supplementary Figure 1.RESULTS
The clinical characteristics of patients in the discovery and replication cohorts and the association with disease progression are shown in Table 1. For localized prostate cancer, 45 (30.0%) and 75 (43.9%) patients experienced disease progression after radical prostatectomy (RP) during the median follow-up of 23 and 30 months in the discovery and replication cohorts, respectively. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis, pathologic Gleason score, and pathologic stage were significantly associated with cancer progression in both cohorts. In the advanced prostate cancer group, 271 (74.5%) and 180 (75.3%) patients had disease progression after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) during the median follow-up of 61 and 57 months in the discovery and replication cohorts, respectively. PSA at ADT initiation, and PSA nadir were significantly associated with cancer progression in both cohorts. Gleason score, clinical stage at diagnosis, and treatment modality were also associated with progression in the discovery cohort, but only weakly associated in the replication cohort.Prostate surgery outcomes vary with Vitamin D Receptors– May 20176401 visitors, last modified 15 Nov, 2019, This page is in the following categories (# of items in each category)Attached files
ID Name Uploaded Size Downloads 8109 PC survival.jpg admin 16 Jun, 2017 23.41 Kb 734 8108 VDR Prostate Cancer-min.pdf admin 16 Jun, 2017 1.02 Mb 757